Make no mistake, we ARE at war … how to radicalize future combatants ….. part 1

Posted on by undercoverkity

Meow everyone, this will be an ongoing series of the radicalization of students to become more militant for a plethora of so called ” causes ” . However in order to know why students are targeted, and become radicalized ,  we must first understand the radicalization process and how this is achieved. As the title states, we ARE at war , therefore, we need to know our enemy , who they are and how they become said enemy.

 

Today’s wars while no less bloody than large scale conflicts , are fought in urban areas, and mostly by so called  ” soldiers ” who are already , and have been there for years, possibly , and quite likely, born in the very areas they now fight ……. against their own citizens .These wars are as deadly as some of the larger conflicts but because  of the means by which people die as a result of these ” battles ” they draw considerable more media attention that you long standing traditional war. Our days of social media and instant information  now add to the totality of the battle ground and does, hand in hand, fight two battles on two different fronts at the same time. The first battle of course is the one where lives are lost, however, the second battle , one of significant importance is the battle over the decemination of the battle results and the spreading of the propaganda that goes hand in hand with the main battle.

 

The propaganda is what I a gong to focus on as this is where the radicalization process begins . The wars we are fighting today are largely religious wars , primarily between those who want to force Islam upon us and those who resist this forceful take over attempt. Now before I go any further , I want to make it very clearly that I strongly  oppose ALL religion,  for a variety of reasons. Historically , the vast majority of wars have been religious based, or sanctioned, or both.  

 

Radicalization takes many forms, from the in your face ,  ” convert or i’ll kill you ” mentality , to the more subtle form of radicalization were one is encouraged to distance them selves from people, including their own direct family members , if those members do not convert to their religion. The later method starts , often times at a very young age . Here is one example of this subtle form of radicalization : 

 

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/jehovah-s-witness-grandparents-ordered-to-keep-faith-to-themselves-1.3282193

” … A pair of devout Jehovah’s Witnesses have been ordered by a B.C. provincial court judge not to talk about religion in front of their four-year-old granddaughter.

The couple lost their bid for unsupervised access to the girl because they insisted on taking her to worship at their faith’s Kingdom Hall despite the repeated objections of the child’s mother.

The girl is identified only as A.W. and the grandparents as A.R. and B.R. in Judge Edna Ritchie’s 12-page decision. And for now, they’re on a short leash.

“There are many people with strongly held religious views that do not discuss those views in front of others, and specifically not in front of children,” Ritchie wrote.

Unless A.R. and B.R. can satisfy the court that they can comply with the mother’s wishes, Ritchie said, “their time with A.W. must be supervised and limited.”

Religious rights vs. parental responsibility

The case pits the Family Law Act against the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The Family Law Act states that only a guardian has parental responsibilities, including decisions about religious upbringing, and the mother, M.W., is sole guardian. 

But A.R. and B.R. argued that forbidding them from expressing their faith to their grandchild would violate a charter right to practise their religion.

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled a custodial parent can’t limit another parent’s ability to discuss religion unless the child’s best interests are threatened

The grandparents want A.W. to experience their religion, while M.W. insists her daughter “can decide when she is older whether or not to participate in any religious practices.”

The battle is the culmination of a saga that began when the child’s biological dad, L.R., told his parents he had fathered a child three weeks after A.W. was born.

L.R. was “disfellowshipped” from the Jehovah’s Witness faith, a type of religious excommunication. He testified that he has little contact with A.R. and B.R. He also pays no child support and has no parental responsibilities.

A.R. and B.R. were determined to have contact with their granddaughter, and the child’s mother felt it important for them to be part of their lives. She previously allowed them unsupervised access.

Poppa and Momma vs. Grandpa and Grandma

But according to the decision, the relationship between the “well-meaning, determined grandmother” and M.W. has been strained from the outset.

M.W. also objected to the couple insisting the girl call them Poppa and Momma instead of Grandpa and Grandma. But by far the biggest disagreement arose over visits to the Kingdom Hall.

From the time A.W. was a baby, A.R. and B.R. took her to services; M.W. said she wasn’t happy, but didn’t object until December 2013.

She switched the timing of their visits, but then learned from her daughter the grandparents had taken A.W. to services the following spring; A.R. insisted the child “had begged to go to Kingdom Hall.”

Visits were then limited to supervised access at M.W.’s home.

But even at that, M.W. was upset to find her daughter watching a Jehovah’s Witness video on A.R.’s laptop. The grandmother insisted the child had pushed the play icon before she could stop her.

Mother knows best

The judge noted that when two or more parents with different religious views share parental responsibility the court will often support the child being exposed to each religion involved.

But because A.R. and B.R. are not guardians, the court was bound to respect the decision of the mother. For that same reason, Ritchie also found the charter argument didn’t apply.

The couple cited another Supreme Court of Canada case involving a divorce in which a mother with custody had obtained an order forcing her Jehovah Witness ex-husband not to discuss religion with their children.

In that case, the top court ruled a custodial parent does not have a right to limit the other parent’s ability to discuss religion unless the child’s best interests were threatened.

In this case, Ritchie found it wasn’t fair to place A.W. in a holy war between her mother and grandparents. 

“I am concerned that the applicants’ demonstrated inability to respect and comply with M.W’s decisions on religion will continue to cause conflict,” she wrote. “It is not in A.W.’s best interests to be exposed to that conflict.” … “

 

I have often referred religions as death cults . I would most certainly say the the Jehovah Witness religion fits into this group. Another , much more obvious and in your face religion is Islam , the religion of some of the worlds most violent, dangerous  and radicalized group of people. This death cult has cause the vast majority of deaths by terrorism over the past several decades than any other religious cult, perhaps more in fact than all the other religious cults combined. Some are radicalized in their later years, however,  the trend is to start this radicalization process at a very young age ….. at the PRE-SCHOOL LEVEL   . Think I’m kidding? This video should make this point very clear :

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57Q8K5TmivM

 

We already know Hamas as being a terrorist organization and this video shows how they indoctrinate the very young to hate people who are Jewish, to the point to encouraging these young people to one aspire to kill them . 

 

 

http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm

( a  partial USA list )

” … Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) are foreign organizations that are designated by the Secretary of State in accordance with section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended. FTO designations play a critical role in our fight against terrorism and are an effective means of curtailing support for terrorist activities and pressuring groups to get out of the terrorism business. … ”

 

… and from our own Canadian government :

 

http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/cntr-trrrsm/lstd-ntts/crrnt-lstd-ntts-eng.aspx

 

 

The above video clearly shows just how young these well establish violent terrorist start the indoctrination process , a process where terrorism is an accepted part of their daily lives, as well,  something they are brain washed  into potentially carrying out in their later years.

 

These kids grow up , sometimes move  away from home but for many , the radicalization process has consumed their lives. they attend some of our finest universities, meeting unsuspecting  students , students not yet aware of their own outside world. These students are now open targets for the well establish radicals to brainwash and indoctrinate them ( the unsuspecting students ) into a world filled with hate and violence. One very clear and recent example took place at Ryerson University . The images tell the story on their own :

 

2015_1021_16403700

 

Oh but wait,

 

1610972_987961841271626_126245073590844993_n

 

So, from the video aimed at small children , a video teaching them at an early age to devalue life, to something now at local universities where many more are reached, whether they want to be or not. This in of itself is a form of terrorism.  No, no one was killed, however, terror exists to create a sense of fear and insecurity in individuals and groups. The person or persons who made the above statement as depicted, in a public space with a captive audience , has accomplished this first, initial stage of terrorism .

 

Terrorism has evolved significantly over the years. W are used to hearing and reading about large scale attacks against targets and / or people by the usual established groups . However, over the past two or years , we have seen a shift from the large scale, highly publicized attacks , to smaller, more direct, one on one attacks. Recent example of this are t two attacks, right here in Canada ,  against Warrant Officer Vincent and Cpl. Cirillo . Bother were uniformed military persons engaged in their duties .

 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/ottawa-shooting-one-year-later/article26923449

” … It was a week that shocked the world and put Canada’s capital on lockdown: A soldier run down by a self-styled jihadi in Quebec, then a deadly attack on Ottawa’s war memorial and Parliament Hill. … “

 

Terrorism  is defined as In Canada, section 83.01 of the Criminal Codedefines terrorism as an act committed “in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause” with the intention of intimidating the public “…with regard to its security, including its economic security, or compelling a person, a government or a domestic or an international organization to do or to refrain from doing any act.” Activities recognized as criminal within this context include death and bodily harm with the use of violence; endangering a person’s life; risks posed to the health and safety of the public; significant property damage; and interference or disruption of essential services, facilities or systems. 

 

I showed a very recent set of events at Ryerson University  that clearly and specifically targeted one group of people. This is not the first time that Jewish students in Toronto have been targeted at a Toronto university . 

 

In part 2, I will delve deeper into  the university student unions who openly and actively promote hate towards Israel and Jewish students . As usual, names and faces will be shown so everyone will see who these trouble makers and promoters of terrorism are.

 

STAY TUNED ………………..

 

 


📂This entry was posted in student radicalization urban terrorism

Comments are closed.